Software engineer interview prep, head-to-head
Most SWE prep tools are static: a LeetCode subscription, a system-design book, a Discord. Interview Lift works during the actual interview.
Built for the three SWE rounds you cannot fail
Coding rounds — complexity-first hints
When the interviewer drops a problem in CoderPad or HackerRank, Interview Lift reads the prompt, restates it, lists clarifying questions worth asking, then suggests an approach in plain English — time + space complexity stated up-front. You stay in control of typing the code; the copilot keeps you from coding before thinking.
System design — scaffolds calibrated to level
A senior system-design answer is not "more boxes" than a mid-level one — it is different trade-offs. Interview Lift detects the level (L4 vs L5 vs L6) from the prompt and your earlier resume context, then suggests the appropriate scope: capacity estimation, API contract, datastore choice, cache strategy, and failure-mode reasoning.
Behavioral rounds — STAR prompts on demand
The copilot keeps an indexed library of your real stories (uploaded from your resume during onboarding) and surfaces the best-fit STAR scaffold the moment the interviewer asks "tell me about a time when…". You speak; the copilot keeps the structure intact.
Editor-aware coding mode
Recognises CoderPad, HackerRank, CodeSignal, LeetCode, Codility, and Karat. When the editor opens, the overlay switches to coding mode: AST-aware hints, complexity callouts, and runnable mental-model tests — without ever typing into the editor for you.
Recruiter screen + take-home support
Recruiter screens leak more bombs than candidates expect ("what is your target comp?", "are you in any active loops?"). Interview Lift coaches the answer in real time. For take-homes, the resume context primes the copilot so your solution sounds like *your* code, not template code.
Onsite-loop mode
During a 5-round onsite virtual, fatigue is the killer. The copilot tracks which competencies have already been covered, so by round 4 it surfaces what the panel still needs to see — leadership signal, conflict resolution, technical depth — rather than recycling the same story.
